Skip to main content

Hamlet Hail to the Thief review

Hamlet Hail to the Thief is an ingenious amalgamation of ideas. Co-creators and directors Christine Jones and Steven Hoggett have managed to take one of Shakespeare's longest plays, condense it into a slick 1 hour 45 minutes, and inject a new intensity by utilising the music of Radiohead. 

The Hail to the Thief album has been effectively rearranged and decontectualised by Thom Yorke himself, with various elements of songs are intricately woven throughout the play, rather than slapping unaltered pieces alongside the play. The vocal harmonies of 2 + 2 = 5, or the glockenspiel(?) melodies of Sit Down, Stand Up, for example, taking on a renewed, incredibly eerie role. There is an authenticity to Hamlet Hail to the Thief, and it in no way feels like vanity project. Even not having Radiohead themselves perform allows for the music to take more of a backseat when it needs to, and fulfill more of a soundtrack role. 

Underneath all of the trickery, Samuel Blenkin's performance as Hamlet was sublime. Playing up the delusional, neurotic tendencies of Hamlet, whilst still bringing in elements of infantile humour. A near perfect characterisation. The way in which I interpreted the production, was that we were viewing the events not as they unfolded, but as they happened in Hamlet's mind. This is further cemented by numerous elements, such as having the "ghost" of Hamlet's father not as a physical presence, but as a projection. The music, the all-black costumes, the whole cinematic nature of this production comes across as the construction of Hamlet's delusions. Even the dancers seem to become a form of Greek chorus in his mind. This framing starts to make you question what is real and what is not. Are the kisses Hamlet receives from Ophelia (played by the entrancing Ami Tredea) all just in his head?

Hail to the Thief is a very political album, and that theme seems to have worked its way into this production. In a scene where Guildenstern and Rosencrantz (Felipe Pacheco and James Cooney) are lying to Hamlet, one of them makes the "power thumb" gesture. This gesture emulates the mannerisms of modern day politicians. This is a Hamlet that very much feels of the present, and has a lot to say about the time in which we live. Hamlet's muddled thinking and sometimes misplaced rage seems to echo that of the politics of Thom Yorke. Or perhaps in this context, the personal struggle of Hamlet is a metaphor for discontent with "the system".

Alby Baldwin brings a levelheaded intelligence, as well as a vulnerability to the role of Horatio. This is often demonstrated in much more subtle ways, like breaking from a dance number in order to comfort an Ophelia on the edge of breakdown. 

On a lighter note, Claudius (Paul Hilton) resembles Ed O'Brien, perhaps the most typically "cool" member of Radiohead. Although I am sure this is total coincidence, I like the idea that the man Hamlet sees as stealing away his mother is the vision of a sexy, sleezy, silver-fox rockstar. Hilton and his on stage lover played by Claudia Harrison put in a performance that matches the brilliance of their co-stars.

I think it is worth recognising that this could have easily been a very bad production. Jones and Hoggett have cleverly chosen an album that facilitates the story rather than distracts from it.  Where Radiohead's greatest hits could have easily been shoehorned in, the whole approach taken, feels like one which honours both sets of original material. This Hamlet is conceptual genius, and I am beyond impressed. ★★★★★



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Not Your Life review

Not Your Life follows Jacob (Yalim Danisman), who returns from war to find that his best-friend (Rian Cash) and his best-friends' wife (Lucy Clifton) have made a life for themselves in the house Jacob used to call home. What entails is an exploration of the jealousies and fractures within the trio, as they bubble to the surface after years of repression.  A story conceived by Yalim Danisman (writer and performer) and Ege Kucucuk (director), Not Your Life is performed at the Etcetera Theatre, a small but formidable pub theatre. The Etcetera is a successful catalyst for developing talent. Spaces like this are increasingly rare (the loss of Vault Festival, for example, still casts a shadow) and it is great to see venues providing a platform for up-and-coming talent. Not Your Life is an intimate and varied portrait of relationships, be it as friends, enemies or lovers. All the unfolding drama is against the backdrop of the residual trauma of warfare and childhood. Not Your Life also se...

Giant review

Mark Rosenblatt's Giant is a meticulously devised, and thought provoking play. It follows Roald Dahl - with his publishing team in crisis - as they grapple with the implications of an anti-semitic article he wrote just prior to the release of The Witches. The article in question pertains to Dahl's views on Israel (and its people), which becomes a source of anger for both the general public, and those closest to him. It is in my view, an incredibly intelligent decision to parallel a messy, raw, interpersonal conflict of the past, with a current-day (or rather ongoing) geopolitical one. Rosenblatt manages to convey much of the complexity of the "Israel-Palestine debate" within a slice of life show.   Rosenblatt has managed to craft such a layered depiction of Dahl, even within such a short snapshot of his life. T he formidable John Lithgow brings this vision  to life with his characterisation of Dahl, oscillating between the childlike, the resentful, the passionate, the...

Tuck! review

An abstracted amalgam of comedy, sex and biological disgust, Tuck! (directed by Lou Bristow-Bell) describes itself as a "boun dary-pushing psycho-dream" play. An apt epithet. On this occasion, Tuck!  takes residence in the Baron's Court Theatre, nestling itself under the black painted brick arches of the pub cellar venue - a suitably unsettling setting.  The cast of Tuck! is exemplary. Of particular note are Jack Heffran and Samantha Begeman, who manage to effortlessly recreate the awkward flirting of a couple - in this scene the dialogue shines too. The comic timing and ability to enthral an audience that the entire cast possesses has to be commended.  The play's disturbing moments include: the description of a group ritualistically sucking the blood out of a used tampon, a woman achieving orgasm through being told by how petite she is, and the question "are you wet?" answered not with words - but by reaching between their legs and discovering copious amo...